|
Restaurant Press Releases
Secondhand Smoke and Restaurant Health and Safety
CONTACT:
Paul McIntyre or
Anne Naughton
(916) 780-0226
Since the early 1990's
when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declared secondhand smoke a Class
A carcinogen, tobacco smoke in public environments, and particularly
restaurants, has been at the center of health and safety debate. There are more
than 43 carcinogens in secondhand smoke.
These toxins are responsible for
53,000 lung and cardiovascular disease deaths annually. Children who are
exposed to secondhand smoke have four times higher rates of ear and respiratory
infections, and many times higher rates of asthma as well.
The question
becomes - should laws be passed to protect customers and workers from the
poisons in secondhand smoke, or should restaurateurs be allowed to decide
individually what, if any, smoking restrictions they should apply?
Many
restaurateurs argue that the decision on whether or not to allow smoking in
their restaurant is a matter of freedom of choice that they, as business
owners, have the right to make. They claim the government already has too many
laws regulating their industry and that they don't need one
more.
Freedom of choice does, however, have limits when it comes to
matters of health and safety.
Restaurateurs acknowledge, even encourage,
the government's role in many other health and safety issues. To prevent the
spread of e.coli, hepatitis, salmonella and other food-borne illnesses,
restaurateurs abide by uniform food handling standards. They agree that
blood-alcohol levels cannot be determined by individual choice, but must follow
government-set legal limits.
Disregarding the 43 carcinogens in
secondhand smoke as an insignificant health and safety issue is a negligent
policy for restaurant workers and customers alike. Government does have a role
in health and safety. Expecting restaurateurs to voluntarily govern secondhand
smoke risks is as unrealistic as thinking they should individually develop food
safety or blood alcohol standards.
The tobacco industry worked
tirelessly to debunk and delay acknowledgment of the health risks in firsthand
smoke. Restaurateurs should not look to that industry for guidance on
secondhand smoke. To eliminate the serious health risks of secondhand smoke,
they should follow the recommendations of the American Lung and Heart
Associations, and Cancer Society, and ban smoking in the
workplace.
|