|
Restaurant Press Releases
Secondhand Smoke in Restaurants - A Workplace Concern
CONTACT:
Paul McIntyre or
Anne Naughton
(916) 780-0226
As evidence about the
dangers of secondhand tobacco smoke continues to build, with current studies
showing that 53,000 nonsmokers die annually as a result, exposure in the
workplace has become a controversial issue. It is particularly divisive in
restaurants where a lack of workplace smoking bans results in air quality well
below that which government workers, bankers, doctors, attorneys, accountants,
insurance agents and most other professions enjoy.
With regulators and
policy makers continuing to enact smoking bans, the question becomes: should
some workplaces be exempt? Does the nature of certain vocations, like
restaurant work, require high levels of risk such as constant exposure to the
43 carcinogens in secondhand smoke?
Restaurateurs who resist smoking
bans claim that if an employee is concerned about secondhand smoke exposure
they should work elsewhere - they aren't forced to take the job.
While
it is true that no one is forced to work in a restaurant, the industry's
employment opportunities are too substantial to arbitrarily eliminate as a job
potential. In fact, restaurants provide more people with their first job than
any other industry.
Restaurants also rank extraordinarily high in their
employment of youth. A National Cancer Institute study (Gerlac, et al., 1997)
pointed out that because their work is heavily concentrated in the food service
industry, workers aged 15-19 are least likely to be protected by smoke-free
workplace policies.
Workers in similar industries aren't forced to make
that - accept the risk or don't work here - choice. Airline flight attendants,
for example, were not forced to leave their profession when the dangers of
secondhand smoke became evident. Smoking on airlines was banned to remove the
risk, and compensation for damage already done was successfully litigated in
court.
According to the CDC, secondhand smoke causes 30 times as many
lung cancer deaths as all other air pollutants combined and is particularly
harmful to children. A pregnant mom working in a restaurant or bar should not
have to give up her job simply because it subjects her to secondhand smoke
which endangers her unborn child.
Findings on the hazards of secondhand
smoke have already evoked changes in many places. Providing safe workplaces
requires employers to adapt to change. To truly offer an industry of promise
with healthy lifelong careers, restaurant and bar workers must have the
smoke-free environment that workers in most other promising professions enjoy
already.
|