|
Restaurant Related News
No Smoking Signs May Go Up in Bars and Restaurants
By: Gregory B. Hladky Source: New Haven Register
Published: April 30, 2003
HARTFORD, Connecticut - Landmark legislation to ban
smoking in Connecticut restaurants and bars and to expand anti-smoking
regulations for most businesses passed the state Senate on a 26-7 vote late
Wednesday.
The measure now goes to the state House, where top Democratic
leaders say they have enough support to approve the bill. Republican Gov. John
G. Rowland has also indicated general support for banning smoking in
restaurants and bars.
Senate debate on the plan began shortly before 10
p.m. as supporters argued that second-hand smoke represents a serious health
hazard to both employees and patrons of Connecticut bars and restaurants.
However, critics of the legislation insisted the ban would go too far in
attempting to regulate smoking and would end up hurting the business of some
bars and restaurants.
The senate voted down various amendments aimed at
undermining the bill, including one to raise the legal age for buying
cigarettes from 18 to 21 and another to ban smoking in any motor vehicles when
persons under age 18 are present.
A different proposal to exempt bars
in bowling alleys from the ban was also rejected.
Supporters of the
anti-smoking bill said the measure is a badly needed protection for everyone
who goes into restaurants and bars.
"Where there are smokers, there is
smoke," said the state Senate's top Democrat, Kevin B. Sullivan of West
Hartford. "Where there is smoke, there is second-hand smoke, and where there is
second-hand smoke, there are life-threatening dangers."
However, Sen.
George L. "Doc" Gunther, R-Stratford, warned the legislature was going too far
in the effort to control smoking. "If you want to smoke, I suggest you go out
and be a criminal because you can go to jail and smoke." The bill would not ban
smoking in jail.
Intense backroom negotiations over possible exemptions
to the proposed ban repeatedly led Senate leaders to delay the start of the
debate.
Despite widespread public support for the restaurant and bar
smoking ban, there was enough strong opposition to the proposal from special
interests that several key lawmakers were predicting a close
vote.
"There are a lot of divergent interests on this bill," said state
Senate Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, as he headed back for
another closed-door Democratic discussion of the issue.
Anti-smoking
activists were pushing for landmark legislation that would prohibit smoking as
of Oct. 1 in all Connecticut restaurants and as of April 1, 2004, for bars.
Private clubs with limited memberships, such as the Elks or Veterans of Foreign
Wars posts, that now hold state club liquor licenses as of a specific date
would be "grandfathered in" and be exempt from the ban. Newly chartered private
clubs with liquor licenses would be subject to the smoking
prohibition.
Restaurants with outdoor seating areas could also reserve
some outdoor smoking sections.
State Sen. Christopher S. Murphy,
D-Southington, co-chairman of the legislature's Public Health Committee, said
he believes the exemptions for existing private clubs answers some "legitimate
concerns" by critics.
"This is a controversial issue so there has been
pressure from all sides," Murphy said. The legislation being worked on late
Wednesday also calls for expanding prohibitions on smoking in most businesses.
The proposal would prohibit smoking in all work places with five or more
employees.
Current state law requires businesses with 20 or more
employees to provide smoke-free environments for workers who want
them.
The push for a ban on smoking in restaurants and bars has been
encouraged by strong public support. A Quinnipiac University Poll released
Wednesday found that 64 percent of Connecticut voters support a total ban on
smoking in restaurants and bars, with only 33 percent opposed. Only 18 percent
identified themselves as smokers.
State House Speaker Moira K. Lyons,
D-Stamford, predicted the House would give final approval to the measure next
week.
Lyons said the statewide ban would "avoid a potential patchwork
quilt of local ordinances that could see some towns avoid passing protective
legislation, leaving workers at risk."
The smoking ban bill has been the
focus of intense lobbying by a slew of different special interests, including
the Connecticut Restaurant Association, the anti-smoking MATCH Coalition, and
the Connecticut Bowling Proprietors Association.
Members of the
restaurant association as well as the lobbyists for the bowling group, maintain that
smokers should be allowed some leeway to practice what is a legal
habit.
"A big percentage of bowlers smoke," said Gardner Wright, a
former legislator who is now a lobbyist representing the bowling proprietors.
"A much heavier percentage of (smokers) are bowlers than for the general
population."
|